Re: revisited ITP: webmin

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: revisited ITP: webmin
From: Nick Moffitt <nick@zork.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 18:08:16 -0800
In-Reply-To: <19991211025157.A1221@sindominio.net>; from Jordi on Sat, Dec 11, 1999 at 02:51:57AM +0100
Mail-Followup-To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
References: <Pine.A32.3.96.991209163820.23232b-100000@caesar.power.elte.hu> <19991209182526.B29303@cistron.nl> <19991209094139.B19808@zork.net> <19991209174830.A15624@tardis.ed.ac.uk> <19991211025157.A1221@sindominio.net>

Quoting Jordi:
> Shouldn't it suggest www-browser then?

	It was for this reason that I thought that Suggests: was
merely a "personal preference" field.  I saw others that suggested
metapackages, and some that used massive | constructions to suggest
compatible packages.

-- 
CrackMonkey.Org - Non-sequitur arguments and ad-hominem personal attacks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

References:
- revisited ITP: webmin
  - From: Gergely Madarasz <gorgo@caesar.elte.hu>
- Re: revisited ITP: webmin
  - From: "J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)" <jhm@cistron.nl>
- Re: revisited ITP: webmin
  - From: Nick Moffitt <nick@zork.net>
- Re: revisited ITP: webmin
  - From: Mark Brown <broonie@tardis.ed.ac.uk>
- Re: revisited ITP: webmin
  - From: Jordi <jordi@sindominio.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Is anyone using the oneliner package?
Next by Date: Re: Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL
Prev by thread: Re: revisited ITP: webmin
Next by thread: Re: revisited ITP: webmin
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread